The United States of America is a pioneer. Not in democracy,
or liberty, but in murdering thousands of people – from a world away. In August
of 1945, two planes were sent over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, each
carrying atomic bombs. These single bombs created the devastation that several
thousand conventional incendiary bombs would have created, and literally wiped
the cities off of the earth. Currently, the United States are sending unmanned
drones to Syria, to propel missiles into villages in the hopes of killing a few
jihadists. As time goes on, the United States government is getting better and
better at killing people across the world.
The
massacres at Hiroshima and Nagasaki changed the world by introducing a new type
of warfare: a small group of people very far away decided the fates of
thousands, and an even smaller group of people miles up in the air executed
them. The distance, physical and mental, between the executors and executed
just increases as time goes on and technology advances.
Drone
strikes are sent out by a soldier sitting at a computer, like a kid playing “Call
of Duty.” They target “probable” locations of Islamic extremists and don’t care
much for the civilians that are inevitably killed. The government hails these
strikes as victories, but in reality innocent people are exploding in front of
their families and friends.
These attacks
are beneficial to American interests, but at what cost? Is it more ethical to
kill someone through a computer? Is it okay to rain hell on innocent people to
avoid sending American troops to the front lines?
No comments:
Post a Comment