tenebrism
Thursday, January 29, 2015
Blog 9
Met Trip
Post 7
Build up others, Don't break them down
Extra Blog Q2: The Giving Pledge.
Blog post 6
blog
#8 The Met
Met Trip
Analysis of the Human Race in 2015 A.D. (9)
Ability: Outstanding potential
Technology: Discoveries daily
Advancement:
Stagnant
Flatline
Standstill
Dead.
Wait a second, how is that possible? We have the intelligence, ability and technology to move faster, yet as a society we haven't made major strides to better our race. We haven't cured the diseases plaguing our world. We haven't been able to live comfortably even though there is enough wealth to go around and back. Why are we still living like this?
Why are we still crippled by a tiny virus like Ebola? Is it because we simply don't have the ability to handle it? Some of the greatest minds in medical science are alive today, why can this not be stopped? Well, isn't it unfortunate that some of those minds can't contact the others and work with them simply because one is in the U.S. and one is in Russia? We live in such a segregated world that it is halting our progress. Every country must outdo the others in every field and it completely eradicates any possible attempts at cooperation and slows advancement.
And why are the majority still struggling to live in a society so advanced? By this point we should've eradicated poverty long ago but instead it rings stronger than years past. Those at the top stay at the top and, despite any advancements in society, those at the bottom remain on the bottom, in large and larger numbers. Shouldn't a society that has been to the moon and back, has a computer in every citizen's pocket, and can see down to a size unimaginable be able to sustain its own people? Where did we go wrong?
Met Trip
Met Trip
Here are some of the pictures that I took while we were there:
Ranked in no particular order those were some of my favorites that I came across while traversing the art decked halls of the Met. I would also just liked to point out the striking resemblance of Sean Brogan to the African Body Suit. At one point I couldn't even tell them apart.
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
blog 8
Lately in class we have been talking about poverty and it made me think about how many families are barely getting by due to unemployment, sick family members, or just not making enough money for the work they do. In the article above it talks about how in 2014 Obama's state of the union and how he wanted to raise minimum wage to 10.10. Working at a minimum wage job and only making 8.25 (not 8.75 due to minimum wage finally being increased) it's very easy to see that yes this job provides money and for me it's not a bad salary to make but thats because 1) I don't have anyone to support 2) I'm not trying to live off this money my own. The money i make goes towards saving for college and little things but for individuals that are working jobs like mine and have to go home and put dinner on their table for their family it just isn't enough. I think that minimum wage should be increased to at least 9.50. Minimum wage is supposed to be a minimum way to get by and with this economy our minimum wage just isnt cut for that. Theres no way you can support a family making what the minimum wage is at the moment.
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
The Human Brain
#9
Thursday, January 22, 2015
Blog #9
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
#9: American films and music on foreign countries
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Obama's Plan For the Middle Class #8
Obama's aides have been seeking ways to expand a robust economic recovery beyond top earners, who have been buoyed by record closes on Wall Street. He'll also spell out ways to simplify the way taxpayers apply for education and child care credits, including increasing the top child care credit to $3,000.
To pay for the changes, the administration is proposing about $320 billion in new revenue over the next decade. Obama wants to wring more taxes from investment income - capital gains and dividends - which are taxed at a lower rate than ordinary earnings. Since wealthy Americans are more likely to derive income from investments, they'd bear the overwhelming weight of a higher rate on that type of profit.
#8 the people who really need the money
I am amazed that a professional football player has so much money and is so stupid to use his fame and money to either buy drugs, hurt women, murder and many other things and aren't sent to jail for years because they can pay their bail every time they get locked up. I have strong feelings against pro football players because they don't get action, they don't get punched in the face, loose teeth, get stitches and go back into the game 5 minutes later. Thats why I enjoy college sports a little more than pro because they don't get stupidly rich. They are students, they still have academics to achieve. (Not the point)
I don't know if this bothers anyone else but it surely bothers me. I truly do truly think about the people who struggle vs professional and celebrities and about how much common people struggle and I wish there is a change.
Blog #8
Recently a student at the University of Kansas, Shelby Lawson, wrote this article. It is all about the Michael Brown case and clearing up any questions we may have had about it. This article made me completely re evaluate my stance on the case. It brings up various different points I thought to be true and proves them to be false using the actual grand jury transcript. The ability for this one girl to do all this research and completely change the story that we all probably thought to be true is not only astounding but courageous.
9. Low-income families trying to survive in modern day America
Coming from a lower income family myself, I personally understand the difficulties in the struggle to get by. Even with all the assistance the government offers, just surviving seems out of hands reach. Once you fall below the poverty line, building your way up is incredibly difficult. For one thing, when out of work for a long period of time, and in need money for food, you can apply for food stamps. At first, it comes off as a huge relief, like a burden has been removed from your shoulders. You feel protected, but soon or later, you eventually won’t need those food stamps any more. Yes, there are people who somehow “break the system” and rely on food stamps their whole lives, but those who don’t have to pay back. And not “payback”, no they actually have to pay back the government for what they borrow.
So maybe those who hold onto food stamps when not necessary anymore, actually fear the repercussions of their actions. They know that deep down without them, they wouldn't be able to afford the way of living they had gotten used to, and that they wouldn't be able to live AND pay back their dues. I’m not saying that they system our government has created is wrong, or needs to be fixed, but maybe if we fixed our economy first, and maybe made average living more affordable we wouldn't have issues like this occurring. People wouldn't feel the need to trick the government in order to get by, and maybe the government would be better in the long run.
BLOG 8
Monday, January 19, 2015
Robert Reich (9)
Although Robert Reich is way more knowledgeable and educated than I, I can't help but question some of his points. For example, are minimum wage jobs really intended to provide someone with a living wage? In my opinion, minimum wage jobs are for high school and college students who are just entering the job force, and are not yet equipped for higher-paying jobs. With more experience and/or higher educational degrees, they can then reach for a better job.
Of course, there are many valid arguments that can be made against the above case. Some people can not afford a higher education, and therefore resort to minimum wage jobs to support their families. Although raising the minimum wage may seem like a win-win, teens get paid more while adults can better provide for their family, this is not a perfect solution. When wages are raised, employers usually resort to job cuts in order to maintain or increase profit. Additionally, heads of companies may choose to raise prices for this same reason, and less people will purchase their products. This takes away from the circulation of money in our economy.
Robert Reich raises many valid points, but I would just like to remind everyone to maintain their own opinions. Although his movie and videos are extremely eye opening, there are no simple solutions to our economic crises, and therefore we can not accept his suggestions as being the absolute answer to our problems.
Illegal Immigrants (BLOG #8)
Like everything else, people either agree or disagree with illegal immigration. I personally I cant choose a side. An illegal action is illegal and is not right and these people are living here without paying taxes yet they are very hard working and take jobs that most Americans would not do. There are two very strong arguments dealing with illegal immigrants.
They include:
Illegal immigration benefits the US economy through additional tax revenue, expansion of the low-cost labor pool, and increased money in circulation. They contend that immigrants bring good values, have motivations consistent with the American dream, perform jobs that Americans won’t take, and that opposition to immigration stems from racism.
Opponents of illegal immigration say that people who break the law by crossing the US border without proper documentation or by overstaying their visas should be deported and not rewarded with a path to citizenship and access to social services. They argue that people in the country illegally are criminals and social and economic burdens to law-abiding, tax-paying Americans.
Since these two sides and both convincing and persuading, will we ever just ignore illegal immigration? Or will it always be a problem?
American Sniper
While the film has been a hit with audiences with a record setting $90.2 million at the box office, and A-plus rating among critics, its subject matter is causing controversy among some in Hollywood for its perceived pro-war message. For example, just listen to a quote from documentarian Michael Moore, he says "So here's what I think about "American Sniper": Awesome performance from Bradley Cooper. One of the best of the year. Great editing. Costumes, hair, makeup superb! Oh... and too bad Clint (Eastwood) gets Vietnam and Iraq confused in his storytelling. And that he has his characters calling Iraqis "savages" throughout the film. But there is also anti-war sentiment expressed in the movie. And there's a touching ending as the main character is remembered after being gunned down by a fellow American vet with PTSD who was given a gun at a gun range back home in Texas -- and then used it to kill the man who called himself the 'America Sniper'." His words have garnered outrage from Hollywood and everyday Americans alike
The large response also from social media has translated to widespread racism, also, against Arabs with people saying that this movie made them want to murder them. What I mostly had for this film was respect and I understood the patriotism conveyed through the masterful performances and great actors. Entertaining, tense and thrilling, "American Sniper" devolves into glorification by sugarcoating the truth and creatively changing details to assure we see the hero Chris Kyle was without most of the much darker anti-hero he also was. Eastwood has stripped things back so that we observe the action through American eyes only, our focus as blinkered as that of its titular killer which makes the American response justified and predictable. However, despite its many flaws, 'American Sniper' is still an engaging war drama with some excellent set-pieces and Bradley Cooper continues to showcase his superb acting chops.
Thursday, January 15, 2015
Fetch the Anaesthetist (7)
The following song by British metal band Enter Shikari, "Anaesthetist", was written about the United Kingdom's National Health Service becoming privatized, however without that knowledge one could swear it was written about the United States' health care system. (Warning: explicit language)
Is the prime motto from the Hippocratic oath not "do no harm"? Is turning away those in need not doing harm? Those doctors who studies for years and years because they were passionate to help had to become capitalists in order to survive in the field, and you pay the price.
And what of insurance companies? Are they in the wrong as well? Or course they are. Insurance companies exist for profit. The only reason we need health insurance is because of the completely absurd cost of medical care in the first place. Other countries have publicly funded health care paid for with taxes from the people. There is no middleman trying to make a quick buck, like there are too many of here. The health care system in America is now health care industry fueled by greed and a brutal lack of morals. It is the responsibility of a government to protect the welfare of its people, so why is ours allowing private institutions to "suck the blood of the afflicted"?
"Illness is not an indulgence that you should pay for, nor is it a crime for which you should be punished."
blog #8
I feel an incredible sense of guilt for owning all of the clothes and material items I have but I don't know what to do about it. Sure I donate whenever I can and always participate in food drives and give my clothes to the churches but besides that I feel hopeless. I know how bad the economy is these days and how many people struggle while there's the top 1 percent trying to decide which color Lamborghini they want to drive today or which country they want to fly to in their private jet and it really just disgusts me. When did the United States become this bad and when did everything start to become so unequal? I even fear for when I grow up and have to live by myself in the real world and what kind of struggles I'm going to face economically. This whole thing just frightens me and I fear that things can only get worse for America if we continue on like we have been.
Wednesday, January 14, 2015
Freedom of Speech
So seeings as how its such a marvelous and exemplary privilege to posses its a shame that its very essence is often completely disregarded, or used in a way that can only be described as deplorable. If you asked any average American to list off all of their principle constitutional rights many would be very quick to include the Freedom of Speech, especially over something like the illegal quartering of soldiers, however many often take it for granted and don't really appreciate it. I turn to Walter Lippmann with his essay "The Indispensable Opposition" in which he reveals how many people only tend to truly value freedom of speech when it applies to themselves. I would love to go more in depth on his argument however I could spend an hour just on that so instead I'll put the link at the bottom for anyone who wishes to give it a look.
One issue that irks me more than any other is that of the movie "The Interview". To think that at any time OUR rights and privileges can be stepped on by the whims of terrorists is just absurd. Although no i am not asking for a nuclear missile to be jammed down our throat i do not condone SONY's actions in delaying (initially cancelling) the release of their movie simply because of a threat from one of the most politically corrupt countries in the world. Although the most dramatic, it wouldn't exactly be the first time someone has made a video making fun of North Korea (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxDgQJBVJxg). I believe Jon Stewart like always provides a very striking (and humorous) perspective on the subject. http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/o3r1be/the-silence-of-the-film
regardless of whether you are a journalist or a political activist or just an average Joe, freedom of speech applies to all of us and we must respect and uphold it no matter what. A great man (François-Marie Arouet) once said "I wholly disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it" and i hold that truth to be of the utmost importance if we truly are to remain a "Free" state.
http://grossmont.gcccd.cc.ca.us/bertdill/docs/indispensableopposition.pdf
How Has Poverty Changed Over Time
In the late 1950s, the poverty rate for all Americans was 22.4 percent, or 39.5 million individuals. These numbers declined steadily throughout the 1960s, reaching a low of 11.1 percent, or 22.9 million individuals, in 1973. Over the next decade, the poverty rate fluctuated between 11.1 and 12.6 percent, but it began to rise steadily again in 1980. By 1983, the number of poor individuals had risen to 35.3 million individuals, or 15.2 percent.
For the next ten years, the poverty rate remained above 12.8 percent, increasing to 15.1 percent, or 39.3 million individuals, by 1993. The rate declined for the remainder of the decade, to 11.3 percent by 2000. From 2000 to 2004 it rose each year to 12.7 in 2004.
Since the late 1960s, the poverty rate for people over 65 has fallen dramatically. The poverty rate for children has historically been somewhat higher than the overall poverty rate. The poverty rate for people in households headed by single women is significantly higher than the overall poverty rate.
Is social media ruining us or are we ruining social media?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGrbGpdEftc <- one of the things I saw on facebook that literally left me mind blown.
Poverty in New York
Monday, January 12, 2015
The Robbery of Innocence
I personally feel that innocence cannot be robbed.
Innocence as we feel, is something we accosiate with children but if you reflect on yourself today, you can probably find that you've shed your "innocence" long ago. "Innocence" being the feeling we have as kids that the world is magic or that nothing exists beyond the extent that you've travelled. But as you grow older, you know that the world is quite ordinary and that there are many places that you have never been.
Now I'm not going to try and display my own definition of the term "innocence" but I believe that my point can apply to any. Now to that point.
Innocence is not a possession. It's not something you can hold. It's not something you can pick up, hide somewhere, or steal. It's an ideal. An ideal that we use to define children and in some respects, ignorance. Regardless, the "robbery of innocence" or perhaps, just the loss of it, is a natural part of life. Whatever age you begin to shed your innocence, if you rid of it yourself or you lose it by force, it's apparent that it's a natural part of life. By the mid-teenage years, we have already gotten rid of the views we had as a child. We know that the world is a scary place, and bad things happen, and people of the opposite gender can be more than "friends". We accomplish the realization that the world is not innocent. In turn, realizing that we are not innocent. It's built into our DNA and evolutionary story that we need to rid "innocent" views on the world to survive. The first cavemen needed to realize that the mountain lion over there is a threat, and not cuddly just cause it has fur.
As adults, we know that we've lost our innocent views for awhile. We go through most of our life without it. And admire those who have it. But children look up to adults. They look up to the wisdom they have. The wisdom that is obtained through living life and shedding innocence at a normal age.
Now we may grow and our views on the world take darker turn for obvious reasons. But that's not to say that the world isn't amazing. Just because bad things happen shouldn't deter us that life is a beautiful thing.
Through all the hate and sadness, the key to make the world magic again, is to find the prevailing magic in life. When finding the love and beauty in our own lives, we can have a brighter view of hope in the world.
The Working Poor
I had given it some thought and in class realized that I didn't really think much of it when I saw them standing there. I wondered about this - what kind of person did this make me? Wouldn't I want some compassion from my fellow man?
Well I quickly convinced myself that this was not actually the case, that I did actually feel sympathetic towards the poor, and proceeded on through my day. However, on the way home, I saw a Hispanic man riding his bicycle through the pouring rain. I drove right by.
An hour and a half later, I realized what I had done. I had made the same mistake. In fact, I realized I had even been a little angry with this gentleman; he had been a little too close to the road and I had to swerve around him. I, in my dry, warm vehicle that could have easily fit him and his bicycle, passed him right by and went home. Not only that, but I had the audacity to be frustrated with his presence, which he could not help because he was simply heading home as efficiently as he could.
After all that we discussed in class and the stance I had made up in my mind to take on it, I had decidedly not acted upon any of my views. I was ashamed, really, of what I had done - or rather, what I hadn't done. Sure, one can argue that offering this man a ride would not have been the safest thing to do, but that's not the worst part: I hardly even noticed him.
In summary, I'm not suggesting that we all offer transportation to people we see walking in the rain (though it wouldn't hurt). What I'd rather we all do is not forget these people when we see them and maybe have a little human compassion for them.
Regardless of where they come from or whether or not they're here legally, the point is that they certainly are here, and they're not leaving, so we might as well lend them a hand. This can be done in many ways, of course, and it doesn't matter how you go about it; it's the principle that counts. Just don't forget that they are there, and that, if misfortune seeks you out, you might someday be among them.